AU exports / transactions touching an autonomous-sanctions-listed jurisdiction
scenarioAUaml_ctfSourceAutonomous Sanctions Act 2011 (Cth); Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011
An Australian person or entity proposes to export goods, transfer funds, or provide services to a counterparty in a jurisdiction subject to Australian autonomous sanctions (e.g. Russia, Iran, DPRK, Myanmar — DFAT list current). The transaction may require a DFAT permit or may be absolutely prohibited under the Autonomous Sanctions Act 2011 and Regulations 2011.
Applies when
transaction_type=goods_or_funds_transfercounterparty_country=sanctions_listedcountry_of_operation=AU
Applicable legislation (2 items)
- cth/act-2011-038Primary sanctions statute
- cth/act-2006-169Overlapping AML/CTF CDD obligations
Applicable topics (2 claims)
- Autonomous Sanctions — permit regimeinstitutionalPrimary prohibition + permit regime
- Sanctioned-person screening obligationinstitutionalScreening precondition
Co-applies within this scenario (2 relationships)
Rules don’t globally co-apply — they co-apply when the scenario is true. The pairs below reinforce each other under the AU exports / transactions touching an autonomous-sanctions-listed jurisdiction predicates.
- Autonomous Sanctions — permit regime↔Sanctioned-person screening obligationboth_apply
Permit regime and screening obligation together define the AU autonomous-sanctions compliance surface
- AML/CTF Act — designated services + reporting entity↔Autonomous Sanctions — permit regimemutually_reinforcing
AML/CTF CDD + autonomous-sanctions screening reinforce each other on sanctioned-counterparty transactions
Try this in Tailor Fabric
Tailor Fabric can pin this applicability subgraph into any document or meeting context — outline generation, pipeline construction, and compliance review will all draw from the legislation and topics above.
POST /api/scenarios/match